reesesWeb

Any of you have a recommendation for a Mac-friendly non-iPod video capable portable media players that handle video? I'm disqualifying the iPod for now as its codec support is pretty minimal. Otherwise, it has almost everything I'm looking for.

Other than that, I'm looking at the Creative Zen Vision W, which looks great on "paper" but is ugly and doesn't love the Mac. In fact, the only way to get it to work with a Mac is to use xnjb, an open source MTP application. Suck. That's so far from iTunes integration that it makes my head spin.

Challenge by Moss on September 13, 4:25

It's interesting--I've thought for a while that it would be cool for Ruby to steal some of Lisp's more advanced features. Ruby has a way of taking esoteric computer science techniques and making them deliciously readable and easy to use, so I'd love to see a Rubyish implementation of, say, macros. But I never could have guessed that we'd come so far so quickly in implementing the most important Lisp feature of all: violently defensive community resistance to even the mildest criticism! Now that's innovation!

I went to look at the new MacBook today at the Apple store. I feel this desire to replace both my G4 PowerBooks with another Macintosh laptop.

Now that I've validated its functionality, I'm ready to migrate the Mac Mini to be a home theater pc, and I miss the dual screen functionality afforded by having a laptop with screen-spanning ability.

That said, the MacBook non-Pro will not be replacing anything at my house any time soon.

The good:

• The keyboard is much nicer than it looks. I expected a Mattel Aquarius experience, but it types almost as well as my PowerBooks. It took about three femtoseconds to adjust.

I have some .dfont files I wanted to convert into true type (ttf) files. .dfont files are peculiar to the Mac, and peculiar to Mac OS X, which seems kind of strange, because they're data-fork true type font files.

9:30 PM: Start Parallels and create a pre-configured instance for Windows XP, modifying RAM allotment to 512MB, relocating the data files to an external FireWire Drive, and changing the CDROM from an ISO file to the Mac's SuperDrive DL.

9:35 PM: Put Windows XP disk in drive, start VM.

9:46 PM: Windows XP installer says,"39 minutes left to install," as it copies files, probes hardware (probably especially easy with a virtual machine with constrained virtualised hardware), and tells me how much better life will be with XP. On my last install (on a PC), 39 became 23 which lasted for FOUR HOURS.

With all apologies, I was home sick, up late at night, and am leaving town later today for someplace with no reliable Intardweeb access. Hence, AFD comes a day early.

Or, I live just east of the International Date Line!

Update: Here's a plot of traffic to the site initiated by casual astroturfing:

Digging out the orphan pages from the old blog, I came across this:

Interesting article on OpenTalk load balancing. Especially interesting is this quote:

Question from Len - which will distribute load better - a random round robin, or a sequential? Something for us to think about as he gets ready to run. The sequential distributed pretty evenly. There are some useful statistics available from the clients and servers - how long (aggregate) requests queued up, etc. Random round robin does worse, as the random assignment sometimes tosses "too much" load at a single server.

I was walking home last night, up Market Street, and I heard the following conversation:

"I need cable, because I can't have DSL, you know?"
"Yeah."
"I mean, cable is so much faster. It's not a T1, but it's fast."
"Yeah."
"It's so much faster than DSL. DSL is faster than dialup, but it's just another kind of dialup, you know?"
"Yeah."